🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold move to restrict social media access for those under 16 is creating waves worldwide. Officials, campaigners, and families are observing intently to see if this strategy will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

European Movement

In Europe, a rising chorus of countries are exploring parallel measures.

• The Danish government has stated a ban on social media for under-15s, with the PM stating that phones and apps are "taking away our children's youth". The policy is expected to be enacted next year.
• The Norwegian government is set to introduce a age restriction of 15, citing the need to shield children from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a online verification tool to verify the user details of social media account holders. Officials have indicated that an Australia-style ban could be "one of the tools under consideration".
• In Spain, the leader has asked parliament to enact a law lifting the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the president has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a similar move, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Dutch government has recommended families to block their children from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has passed a non-binding motion supporting a ban for under-16s except if guardian approval is granted. Even though it highlights of the "addictive" design of these apps, the move does not enact enforceable legislation.

"A strong age limit is a solid foundation," commented a leading parliamentarian driving the initiative.

Britain: A Cautious Stance

For the United Kingdom, the administration has not ruled out a possible ban, emphasizing that "nothing is off the table" but maintaining any policy must be "supported by conclusive evidence".

Earlier, support built behind a legislative effort to impose limits on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately modified. Nonetheless, the administration committed to conduct more studies the issue.

Campaign organizations have raised concerns. A prominent charity established by the relatives of a teenager who was lost after being exposed to harmful platform posts contends that a simple age ban could fail to improve online safety and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of exposure when young people become eligible.

"This ban is a response to the failure of the Silicon Valley to build platforms and apps that are secure and fit for minors," commented a influential child protection advocate.

America: A Decentralized Approach

Across America, regulation is largely happening at the local level against a backdrop of federal inaction.

• Utah demands guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has signed a law barring under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has approved a law capping under-16s to one hour of social media use per day, with extra access needing parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly passed laws requiring adult authorization for under-16s to set up social media presences.

Despite widespread concern and proposals from various figures to mimic this path, a federal ban is presently seen as improbable.

Global Perspectives

Beyond Europe and the US, further countries are also exploring options.

• The Malaysian government aims to ban social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

But, world organizations strike a more cautious tone. A major UN agency has advised that age-based restrictions have downsides and "might have unintended consequences". The agency notes that online platforms can be a "critical link" for isolated youth and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to improve child safeguards.

While this international discussion continues, the policies of Australia and several other countries indicate that governments internationally are no longer willing to delay for the industry to self-regulate.